Discussions of this issue focus on two claims: Generally speaking, two features are necessary for an issue to be considered an "applied ethical issue. Suppose a person is about to be killed by a culpable aggressor but has a gun that she can use to defend herself.
Ina couple from Bloomington, Indiana gave birth to a baby with severe mental and physical disabilities. It is ironic that my love for the outdoors led me to purchase a vehicle that burns fuel inefficiently.
Not everything we are good at makes us happy. Issues in Applied Ethics As noted, there are many controversial issues discussed by ethicists today, some of which will be briefly mentioned here. According to many feminist philosophers, traditional morality is male-centered since it is modeled after practices that have been traditionally male-dominated, such as acquiring property, engaging in business contracts, and governing societies.
Something the horrified masses of Australia often forget when hearing about shootings overseas is the outrage and backlash in our own country when semi-automatic rifles were outlawed in Opponents of more gun control argue that there are already some 20, gun laws in the United States, and that, as more laws pass, more gun violence occurs.
Most estimates place the number of guns in the United States at somewhere over million. For example, in response to my natural feelings of fear, I should develop the virtue of courage which allows me to be firm when facing danger.
Government accountability It is both a long time rallying cry of the gun rights lobby and an enshrined Amendment in the Constitution of the USA that the last line between a tyrannical government and the freedom of its citizens is the ability of those citizens to defend themselves.
Duty theories base morality on specific, foundational principles of obligation. Even when these norms conflict, the process by which they are negotiated suggests a value in accepting the outcomes.
But if the original case implied regular citizens should have the general right to own guns, the modified case should imply prisoners should have the general right to own guns.
On this model, the agent becomes part of the situation and acts caringly within that context. Nor is everything which makes us happy good for us.
While most criminals are indeed acting in poorly calculated self-interest, not all of them are. Martin Luther King, Jr. Yet no one can forfeit his right of self-defense against wrongful attack. This greatly increases the risk to criminals and making crime too dangerous to consider.
First, Bentham proposed that we tally the consequences of each action we perform and thereby determine on a case by case basis whether an action is morally right or wrong. And it is not a job that can be left simply to politicians, the courts, and the police.
Whenever a person is harmed who could have defended herself if she had had a gun, and her lacking a gun is attributable to restrictions the state imposes on their possession, the state has violated her right of self-defense.
A fourth and more recent duty-based theory is that by British philosopher W. Gun Control Background This classroom activity takes up a slightly different question from traditional gun control activities that pit opposing arguments regarding the rights of gun owners against gun control advocates.
References and Further Reading 1. Second, they are universal insofar as they do not change from country to country. Therefore, for selfish reasons alone, we devise a means of enforcing these rules: What about alternative policies?
Nor is it simply about liking or not liking control. I suggest that we test them by imagining a situation in which individuals are continuously at high risk of being wrongly attacked and even killed but in which the state aggressively prevents them from having guns, or indeed any means of self-defense at all.Social Contract Theory then explains the variation in gun rights between the several states.
People in, say, Massachusetts have, through their elected leaders, decided that they wish to live under a more stringent gun control regime than people in. Gun Control: The Debate and Public Policy using rational choice theory to demonstrate the inability of regulation to stop the flow of guns into neighborhoods where crime is the dominant employer in local labor markets.
The Politics of Gun Control (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, ). 2. sides of the gun control debate; (3) a critical ap-praisal of the positions of each side; and (4) some suggestions about a future that is without ordi-nary citizen ownership of guns.
The author ar-gues that based on an ethical rights model of analysis, an ordinary citizen’s right to bear arms is outweighed by other competing rights claims. Explain A Relevant Ethical Theory On Gun Control.
Topic Proposal | PHI/ PHI/ | Tonya Sanford 12/16/12 Introduction to Philosophy | KIRSTEN GERDES | Topic Proposal A salient issue of controversy is gun control. Gun control is the regulation of sales and uses of firearms. Two discrete ethical beliefs are at war in the gun control debate, social utilitarianism and individual rights.
These two philosophies are incompatible and, further, that is impossible to secure or validate unlimited individual rights of gun owners on utilitarian grounds. Social Psychology in the Gun Control Debate 1 Theories of Social Psychology in the Gun Control Debate Arron Quentin Umberger Bluefield State College Social Psychology in the Gun Control Debate 2 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to offer a social psychological analysis of the gun control debate within the United States.Download