Final groupthink and decision making

Groupthink has become a widely accepted theory particularly in the fields of social psychologyforeign policy analysis, organizational theory, group decision-making sciences, and management. Who is the decision for? Prior decision making work in rational decision making focused on models that reduce or eliminate emotional bias.

It also helps to have two spokes, one of them presenting the viewpoints and proposals from their small group, the other to take notes of what other groups have to say. Instead, look for contrarians and get their points of view. However, consensus can be used successfully by larger groups - see who uses consensus and consensus in large groups for case studies and suggestions on making it work.

Discuss your preliminary conclusions with important stakeholders to enable them to spot flaws, make recommendations, and support your conclusions.

Usually a combination of processes is needed for smooth and successful large group consensus. Sharing power Consensus enables us to take collective control over the decisions that affect us. Give everyone space to finish and take time to consider their point of view.

It is clear from these experiments that people are very concerned with being correct, leading to conformity across many situations. Instead, what we have is a culture of standardization.

However, some psychologists say that the MBTI lacks reliability and validity and is poorly constructed. Nevertheless, processes of environmental scanning and strategic planning are designed to perform problem reconnaissance to alert business people to problems that will need attention down the line.

When words represent some indistinct idea, they are susceptible to reinvention or distortion with potentially significant unintended consequences.

Click To Tweet 4. Look for amendments that address these concerns. Taking time to make a good decision now can save wasting time revisiting a bad one later.

According to Katsenelinboigen, the two styles reflect two basic approaches to uncertainty: On the other hand a trial run of something might need less enthusiastic support from everyone. Or the opposite can happen!

Recent research[ citation needed ] has shown that risk-taking behaviors in adolescents may be the product of interactions between the socioemotional brain network and its cognitive-control network. A third area of information gathering involves determining the possible scope and impact that the problem and its consequent decision might have.

Also, the in-group was evaluated more positively than the out-group on an evaluative scale; the participants were asked, with a point scale, to describe the likelihood of detailed and global perceivers to exhibit behaviors such as creativity, intelligence, and irritability.

It may sometimes feel frustrating that in consensus just one or two people can bring up a concern and expect everyone else to deal with it.

This provides a clear process for finding a way forward. If a new proposal comes up or a proposal is changed significantly over the course of a meeting, it always goes back to the member co-ops for further discussion and approval.

This is then tested in the same way as above.


In groups where there are different people at each meeting it can be hard to know which of the new people will end up getting fully involved. For example in emergencies, appointing temporary leaders or an emergency group may be the wisest course of action.

See the sections on Dealing with power dynamics and common challenges - some people have more power than others for ideas on tackling informal hierarchy. This could be done by the facilitator, the person who brought up the issue or by someone with lots of knowledge about it. At some point, we all do.

In a study that described the construction of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory CMNIeleven factors were found that contributed to the sex-typed norm of a masculine person including traits such as dominance and self-reliance.Groupthink: Groupthink, mode of thinking in which individual members of small cohesive groups tend to accept a viewpoint or conclusion that represents a perceived group consensus, whether or not the group members believe it to be valid, correct, or optimal.


Groupthink reduces the efficiency of collective. Decision making is a vital component of small business success. Decisions that are based on a foundation of knowledge and sound reasoning can lead the company into long-term prosperity; conversely, decisions that are made on the basis of flawed logic, emotionalism, or incomplete information can.

Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.

Group members try to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation of alternative viewpoints by actively.

Groupthink theory and its implications for group decision making methods

GROUPTHINK was flight ready, they never mentioned any concern about the O-rings. At the top of the flight readiness review chain, Jesse Moore had every reason to beĀ­. Dartmouth Writing Program support materials - including development of argument.

Fundamentals of Critical Reading and Effective Writing. Mind Mirror Projects: A Tool for Integrating Critical Thinking into the English Language Classroom (), by Tully, in English Teaching Forum, State Department, Number 1 Critical Thinking Across the. In psychology, decision-making (also spelled decision making and decisionmaking) is regarded as the cognitive process resulting in the selection of a belief or a course of action among several alternative possibilities.

Every decision-making process produces a final choice, which may or may not prompt action. Decision-making is the process of .

Final groupthink and decision making
Rated 3/5 based on 28 review