Does not cite sources. Evaluation planning for development of nursing psychomotor skills progresses from a "beginning" level to the level of mastery in five levels: The rubric for this evaluation is accompanied by a checklist and is located in Appendix A.
APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography. Each facet is assigned 5 possible points, with a possibility of 15 total points. Cites most data obtained from other sources. Cohesiveness Ties together information from all sources. Shows vibrant evidence of individual insights into personal and professional development.
The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent.
Assigning 5 possible points to each of these criteria, with a possible total of 15 points, the analytic rubric is accompanied by a checklist of desired content. Clearly organized sections Title page: The analytic rubric for evaluating a nursing portfolio is in Appendix B.
Imitation, in which the student observes and imitates the instructor under supervision; manipulation, in which the student follows instructions and practices; precision, in which the student is able to perform independently with few errors; articulation, in which the skills are coordinated and modified; and naturalization, in which the student has mastered the skill, performing it automatically and with a consistently high level of competency Allnurses.
Items show consistently strong focus, and correct grammar, spelling and vocabulary.
A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis. For the most part, ties together information from all sources. I have chosen the psychomotor skills that I want to assess for these new graduate nurses and have developed an evaluation plan and an analytic rubric specific to those chosen skills.
In addition, the chief nursing officer CNO of my organization has informed me that for this accreditation cycle, the method for evaluating nursing competency for these new graduates will be portfolios.
Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Citations Cites all data obtained from other sources. Each of these eleven criteria is assigned a 2-point value, for a possible total of 22 points.
Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The topic is not clearly defined. Analytic Rubric for Taking Blood Pressure 22 possible points Patient Interview about medical, psychosocial, drug abuse and other factors possibly affecting blood pressure: Noting systolic pressure at which the first pulsing sound is heard.
Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Analytic Rubric for Evaluation of Nursing Portfolio There are essentially two types of nursing portfolios: Noting diastolic pressure at which the sounds disappear. All web sites utilized are authoritative. The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
Tightening screw valve and using inflation bulb to inflate cuff to approximately mmHg pressure Slightly loosening screw valve to allow slow cuff deflation. Every program outcome is headed by a current narrative reflection. The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
The five levels were first articulated as early as but its simplicity and reliability have made it one of the standards for development of psychomotor skills. Checklist of Portfolio Contents: The topic is focused but lacks direction. Placing diaphragm over brachial artery, medial to biceps tendon.
Guidelines for the preparation of a paper portfolio typically include: The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position. Does not tie together information. Topic focus The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment.
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.Evaluation Rubric for Written Summaries of Journal Articles Evaluation Rubric for Research Project Evaluation Rubric for Review Paper Criteria Outstanding Very Good Good Satisfactory Unacceptable Scope and choice of question Paper.
Evaluating a Web Site for Research Rubric Directions: Use this rubric to determine if an Internet site is suitable for research. You do not need to use this rubric for sources that are provided through our subscription databases.
If you have suggestions for improving this rubric please contact. Nursing -- Evaluation Plan With Rubrics In the current scenario, I am a hospital-based director of staff education working with a new group of graduate nurses.
Research paper grading rubric; Research project rubric: Elementary; Research project rubric: Middle; Research project rubric: Secondary Reflection assessment rubric; iPad app evaluation rubric for students; Multimedia presentation rubric; Multimedia project rubric with self-evaluation; PechaKucha/Ignite rubric 1.
Source Evaluation Rubric This rubric can help you determine if a source is a "good" source; one that is reliable to use in your research or paper. It can help you weed out "bad" sources and defend your "good" sources to your instructor. Definition: A rubric is a scoring guide composed of criteria used to evaluate performance, a product, or a project.
A rubric allows for standardized evaluation according to specified criteria, making grading and ranking simpler and more transparent in a reliable, fair, and valid manner at several levels.Download